We all accept the value of the positive feedback - it increases the self-esteem of the other and may generate positive behaviors through the Pygmalion effect; social experiments in schools (Rosenthal study) have showed that expectations and positive feedback generate in the other one the desire to be “in the image and likeness of”, to confirm the hypothesis of the coach, of the professor, of the manager. Your expectations from the person standing in front of you come to life, are updated by him, as Pygmalion created a statue that came to life, because he believed in it.
But positive feedback can be bad. Here are two cases:
1. Unspecific, general - “good job, man”, “congratulations on how you treat others” - if you don't have arguments, it may sound fake, especially if the self-perception of the person about his/her performance is not good. And either way, the person is not aware of it, he/she doesn't know what to repeat next time in order to do it just as good.
2. Said for the sake of the emitter, not of the recipient - to offer positive feedback just for the others to like you, so you grow on them and, why not, on yourself.
And a few useful criteria-questions:
1. What will the recipient learn from this? Is it specific enough for him/her in order to learn something?
If I only say “congratulations, you did a good job”, it is possible that the person attributes the good job to whatever he wants. Adrian Stanciu gave such an example of defensive attribution during a conference, I will tell it as I remember it: let’s say you succeeded to cross a canal with your boat and during the crossing, because there was a good wind and you had nothing to do, you drank and got drunk. Adrian was saying that at the end, you may think, when giving yourself a feedback about your performance, something like: aha, I managed to do it because I was drunk (not in spite of!). I think it would be the same if somebody would tell you: congrats, amazing crossing. You may get to the same conclusion: I managed to do so because I was drunk. How helpful my “positive feedback” was!
2. Why do I give this feedback, what is the internal engine that generates this gesture? Who benefits more of it, I do or the recipient?
If it is only the pumping of my own ego and statute - I think twice. Most of the times, it's a mix - it helps me as well to see myself or others to see me as a generous person and I am also helping the other. It would, however, be good if the balance of the motivation would tip towards the other.
In order to help it tip a bit, I can, for example, change my transmission channel and method - I will not send an e-mail, I will tell it personally (it helps him even more to look him in the eye while I say it, even though, it would be more helpful for me to write it in an e-mail - it is faster, the other see as well that I am nice). Or, on the contrary, I won’t tell it when it’s just the two of us, but I’ll do it in public, during a meeting, if I know that he as well needs the respect of others.
Ștefania Antone
este Managing Partner, Top 20 traineri in Romania in 2019, trainer si consultant cu 17 ani de experienta in crearea si implementarea unor programe de dezvoltarea oamenilor, in mai mult de 50 de organizatii din Romania, Republica Moldova, Bulgaria, Turcia, Ungaria si tarile nordice.
Un interviu MAGIC – ABC-ul engagementului
27 Aug 2024
Team coaching
15 Mar 2024
LEADERSHIP JOURNEYS FOR THE FUTURE OF WORK
07 Feb 2024
Leadershipul inclusiv merita atentie sau nu e nimic nou sub soare?
05 Jun 2023
People Analytics – Cum comunicam ne spune cum lucram
28 Apr 2023
Mami cand trebuie sa te multumesti? – raspunsuri pro si anti perfectionism
27 Mar 2023
Engagement, emotii, wellbeing sau…cultura emotionala – Incotro ne conducem organizatiile?
16 Mar 2023
Cui ii e teama de discutia de evaluare?
25 Jan 2023
“Ar trebui sa vorbim mai mult despre asta”
06 May 2022
Metoda BRAVING – construieste incredere in echipa ta!
13 Apr 2022
Descarca instrumentul despre conversatii dificile
08 Apr 2022
Sala sau online? – aceasta NU e intrebarea
17 Mar 2022
Instrumentul “Ghidul managerului remote” – 9 intrebari care fac diferenta
16 Mar 2022
Instrumentul “Strategii de colaborare remote” – 7 strategii pentru o colaborare eficienta
23 Feb 2022
Instrumentul Growth Feedback – 5 elemente cheie, care fac diferenta
22 Feb 2022
4 mecanisme ale conectarii in echipa si in virtual
26 May 2021
Learning Holiday - rezultatele sondajului
08 Jun 2021
Pandemia callurilor - 7 solutii de vindecare
20 Apr 2021
Conectarea in sesiunile virtuale
22 Oct 2020
Secretele invatarii digitale... sau cum sa te bucuri de singuratate invatand sa inveti
27 Aug 2020
Draga tu, tu stii ca noi chiar putem sa mutam muntii?
21 Jul 2020
Growth Mindset - Growth Failure
31 Mar 2020
Growth mindset in vreme de criza
24 Mar 2020
Bilantul primei saptamani
23 Mar 2020
Winter blues
16 Jan 2020
O altfel de intelegere a limitelor
25 Oct 2019
Cum sa instigam la inovatie, deconspirand trei mituri
21 Oct 2019
Tu ce iti doresti? – cea mai grea si cea mai simpla intrebare
20 Apr 2019
Daca vrei sa iti fie bine, fa ca mine!
21 Oct 2019
Zgomotul din jurul nostru
21 Oct 2019
Destul despre talente. E timpul sa vorbim despre talentati.
21 Oct 2019
Ganduri despre echipe performante din randul 10 al stadionului Anfield
14 Nov 2019
Inspiratie – “Flux, psihologia fericirii” de Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
11 Oct 2019
De ce feedback-ul pozitiv poate fi rau
11 Oct 2019
Rezolutiile noului an - intre VREAU si TREBUIE
11 Oct 2019
Batalia Generatiilor XvsYvsZ
24 Oct 2019
8 MODURI DE A ÎȚI ÎMBUNĂTĂȚI PUTERILE DE OBSERVAȚIE. Atenția și gândirea critică
31 Oct 2019
Cand nesiguranta (de sine) e buna
31 Oct 2019
Ce gust au schimbarile in organizatia ta? – ridichile versus ciocolata, doua experimente
31 Oct 2019
Cum sa faci diferenta de buget de marketing irelevanta
31 Oct 2019